Evidence before judgement
Use evidence and independent verification to decide whether an action is safe rather than relying on superficial red flags.
SECURITY DECISION SIMULATION
Security decision simulation places employees inside realistic business moments where urgency, authority, trusted identities and incomplete evidence compete for attention. CoMaSy measures the decision process rather than asking only whether someone recognises a threat label.
THE DECISION GAP
A decision can be risky even when the sender is known, the story is plausible and the action feels routine. CoMaSy is designed to practise the verification discipline that sits between blind trust and blanket suspicion.
Use evidence and independent verification to decide whether an action is safe rather than relying on superficial red flags.
Expose participants to Hurry, Authority, Comfort and Kill-Switch mechanics across realistic business contexts.
Turn participant choices into defined training signals that can be compared across a bounded pilot.
MEASUREMENT
The pilot ends with an executive review: what changed, what did not, what the evidence can support and whether the organisation should scale, adapt or stop.
Read the methodology →BUYER QUESTIONS
Phishing is one possible scenario type. Security decision simulation covers broader business decisions where the request may arrive through trusted accounts, voice, workflow exceptions or supplier relationships.
No. The design emphasises evidence, independent verification and proportionate action rather than guessing who is ‘good’ or ‘bad’.
Not necessarily. A paid pilot can validate the decision and measurement model without requiring broad multiplayer or enterprise integrations first.
Request a bounded pilot with a defined cohort, risk focus, measurement plan and scale/stop decision point.
DEFINED COHORT. DEFINED METRICS. DEFINED DECISION POINT.