Observable
Metrics are tied to specific participant choices, not inferred personality traits.
METHODOLOGY
CoMaSy turns scenario choices into defined training signals. The purpose is to make behavioural practice observable without pretending that a simulation score is a guarantee of real-world security performance.
Metrics are tied to specific participant choices, not inferred personality traits.
Every metric has a written definition that can be applied consistently across scenario variants.
Baseline and post-variant results are compared within a defined cohort and use case.
Results are training evidence. They do not establish individual security competence or regulatory compliance.
CORE SIGNALS
The participant interrupts the immediate action chain before committing to a consequential step.
Observed fromWhether the chosen response explicitly creates time or space to assess the request before acting.
The participant verifies through an independent, known channel rather than relying on the channel that delivered the request.
Observed fromWhether the selected response uses a separate trusted source, process or contact path.
The participant chooses an immediate higher-risk action without sufficient independent verification.
Observed fromWhether the selected response commits the requested action, credential, payment, approval or disclosure too early.
The pattern of responses across Hurry, Authority, Comfort and Kill-Switch pressure mechanics.
Observed fromWhich pressure mechanism repeatedly produces weaker decisions across the scenario set.
PILOT MEASUREMENT FLOW
INTERPRETATION GUARDRAILS
NEXT STEP
Agree the cohort, risk focus, scenario set and decision criteria before scaling.