KONFYDENCE / CoMaSy

METHODOLOGY

Measure the decision process, not just course completion.

CoMaSy turns scenario choices into defined training signals. The purpose is to make behavioural practice observable without pretending that a simulation score is a guarantee of real-world security performance.

01

Observable

Metrics are tied to specific participant choices, not inferred personality traits.

02

Defined

Every metric has a written definition that can be applied consistently across scenario variants.

03

Comparative

Baseline and post-variant results are compared within a defined cohort and use case.

04

Bounded

Results are training evidence. They do not establish individual security competence or regulatory compliance.

CORE SIGNALS

What the dashboard is designed to show.

Pause Adoption

The participant interrupts the immediate action chain before committing to a consequential step.

Observed from

Whether the chosen response explicitly creates time or space to assess the request before acting.

Verification Rate

The participant verifies through an independent, known channel rather than relying on the channel that delivered the request.

Observed from

Whether the selected response uses a separate trusted source, process or contact path.

Impulse Rate

The participant chooses an immediate higher-risk action without sufficient independent verification.

Observed from

Whether the selected response commits the requested action, credential, payment, approval or disclosure too early.

H.A.C.K. Profile

The pattern of responses across Hurry, Authority, Comfort and Kill-Switch pressure mechanics.

Observed from

Which pressure mechanism repeatedly produces weaker decisions across the scenario set.

PILOT MEASUREMENT FLOW

Baseline → practice → unseen variant → review.

  1. BaselineRun a defined scenario set before targeted practice.
  2. Targeted practiceRehearse the relevant pressure patterns and business workflows.
  3. Post variantUse unseen or materially varied scenarios so simple answer recall does not masquerade as improvement.
  4. ReviewCompare cohort signals, discuss limitations and decide scale / adapt / stop.

INTERPRETATION GUARDRAILS

What CoMaSy can support

  • Repeated decision rehearsal
  • Defined behavioural training signals
  • Cohort-level comparison over time
  • Pressure-pattern diagnostics
  • Management-ready evidence from the pilot

What CoMaSy does not claim

  • A guarantee that an employee will avoid a real attack
  • A clinical or psychometric assessment
  • A substitute for incident response, technical controls or policy
  • Proof of regulatory compliance by itself
  • A verified customer improvement percentage unless a real pilot produced it

NEXT STEP

Test the methodology with a bounded pilot.

Agree the cohort, risk focus, scenario set and decision criteria before scaling.

Request a Pilot →